Secrets of a Hipster HookerThe author's friends are stylish, well-educated, and professionally successful young women in New York City. They also turn tricks on the side for $2,000 an hour. One day she decided to follow in their footstepsThis article is from the September issue of Radar Magazine. For a risk-free issue, click here.
(Photo: Jessica Craig-Martin, shot on location at the Beatrice Inn) Is that a bad thing? I look at Heather, a 28-year-old who has a coveted job in fashion media, in her slinky black dress and silver Cartier bracelet. She looks happy, confident, prosperous. The madam does too. She is in her mid-thirties, tall and lanky. She's wearing black leggings and motorcycle boots and has a vintage Gucci purse looped over her arm. If we met at a party I would peg her as an affluent Ivy League–educated scenester with a media job—and I'd be right. When she isn't hooking up hot young professional women with lonely (or just horny) rich guys, she works as a consultant for a major news organization. And that MBA from a university whose very name makes peoples' hearts beat a little bit faster no doubt comes in handy when trying to determine the maximum hourly market value of a romp in the sack. I'm too nervous to eat, so I sip coffee while the madam tucks into a platter of mock pork. After a few bites, she asks why I'm so interested in writing about prostitution. My mind races. I could answer with references to anything from feminist theory to Belle de Jour. Or I could talk about the fascinating process of getting to know Heather and hearing the intimate details of her lucrative sidelight: selling sex to wealthy, powerful men. But I don't have a coherent answer, and I let an awkward silence linger at the table. After a while the madam says cryptically, "You've got to be careful." I stand self-consciously before the madam in my underwear. "You've got a great ass, but your tits are too small, frankly," she observes. Then she adds decisively, "I'm thinking $950 an hour"After dinner she invites me back to her apartment for a drink. Even though I don't have an appetite, a drink sounds like a damn good idea. The madam lives alone near the restaurant in a rundown railroad apartment furnished with contemporary design pieces. There is an open foldout bed in the living room (friends often crash at her place, she explains). As she hands me a glass of wine, I notice her studying me. "You know," she says lightly, "I could totally send you out on calls. You've got such a unique look. I mean, you're obviously no model, but there's still something totally hot about you." Before I can respond she says, "Take off your clothes." Her tone is calm and authoritative. I must look painfully uncomfortable. "It's not a big deal," she coos, fixing me with a firm stare. I only now realize why Heather is afraid of her: She is one of those people you cannot say no to. I pull off my sweater, step out of my jeans, and stand self-consciously before her in my underwear. "You've got a great ass, but your tits are too small, frankly," she observes. "I mean, I'm sure you have no trouble getting dates, but the girls will tell you, men love breasts." Then she adds decisively, "I'm thinking $950 an hour." I feel a bit queasy but don't protest. I am curious and honestly flattered that she is recruiting me. The force of her personality and the journalistic mystery of what will come next both act powerfully on my mind, pushing me forward. I leave her apartment in a daze. I look at my reflection in the storefront windows and wonder, with a private smile, why she held back on that extra 50 bucks that would have pushed me into four figures.
(Photo: Jessica Craig-Martin, shot on location at the Beatrice Inn) "Rubber" is the one-word response. I generally don't carry them, but in my wallet I happen to have one of the NYC condoms the Department of Health distributes all over the city. When I text the madam back, I know—with a tingle running down my spine—that I am crossing both personal and journalistic boundaries. "I do," I type. Before I know it I'm dashing home to put on some makeup for a two-hour appointment with one of her clients. For the rest of the evening my name will be Violetta.
great piece. Posted by: Andrew718 on August 18, 2008 11:58 PM Very compelling reading. Kudos. Posted by: Hez on August 19, 2008 3:59 AM Your writing skills are way better than your interviewing skills. I just heard Channel 5 morning news in LA interviewing you about your article and YOU WERE HORRIBLE! I was uncomfortable watching the puzzled look on the anchors faces while they were trying to understand what you were trying to say. It sounded as if you were high or really distracted. AWFUL. Posted by: markiela on August 19, 2008 12:29 PM This was a great piece, somewhat depressing though. The whole scene seems like third wave feminism gone awry- though these women are taking advantage of the patriarchal shit in society, they are also reinforcing some fucked up ideas. Posted by: kdilkington on August 19, 2008 2:07 PM Advertisement Of course she was distracted during the interview....poor thing must have been so embarassed. She had lazily plagiarized an old edition of the Happy Hooker from the 70s. This silly story was completely implausible....perpetuating the myth of the wealthy, educated, hip yet stable prostitute. Or...the Happy Hooker. Shame on you, Jessica. If you're going to phone in a story...try to give it at least the RING of truth. And Radar....nice fact checking.... Violetta....hahahah. Posted by: Tatiana on August 19, 2008 4:05 PM I really enjoyed this piece. I would love to read an interview with her, as I'm dying to know more!!!!!!!! Posted by: maggiepebbles on August 19, 2008 4:12 PM I really loved this article! I couldn't read it fast enough. Posted by: italyjo on August 19, 2008 4:41 PM well-written article. it confirms what i and many others already know about high end prostitution - that it attracts fucked up narcissistic women who over-value money. i wasn't surprized when the author ran away after viewing the ugly john - she's obviously an intelligent , healthy person who just discovered the difference between fantasy and reality. in fantasy, the john is always attractive and the sex hot. Posted by: tamsax on August 19, 2008 8:02 PM Reason 4,000,698, 786 why the upper classes need to be put to the guillotine. Posted by: FrankBlack on August 19, 2008 10:57 PM Anyway to get these girls thrown in prison? Now that would be kind of righteous. Posted by: FrankBlack on August 19, 2008 11:00 PM Thrown in prison? Yeah right. They're rich, white and female, so they basically "can't" be sent to prison. This is just another typical example of the privileged, spoiled luxury-class brats of the past 10 years being too lazy to work and using shallow, self-absorbed rationalizations to enable douche bag dipshit behavior. They'd never go to jail. The fact that this 22 year old hack ran around trying to imitate them and glorify them is just proof that she's the same as well. I mean really...who gives a flying fuck about "high class call girls"? Life isn't a fucking Showtime sitcom no matter how much these creepy skanks want it to be. Also, why is it that a lot of these privileged millennial writers never seem to cover real shit? It's always fake-ass, watered down suburban-moved-to-the-big-city type bullshit. Cover something interesting. Or maybe, god forbid, just something that doesn't further empower the spoiled brat behavior of the luxo-class scumbags. Here's a suggestion: write a fucking piece about actual REAL street walkers, (you know, the ones that every single article about "high priced call girls" makes sure to explain are "different" than the ones they're talking about...) and what they have to deal with. Maybe make a difference and draw some awareness to something beyond trendy fucked up little girls wildly stabbing away in the dark, trying to get back at daddy. That is, of course, if the article is even true. I'm kinda leaning towards what Tatiana said...it doesn't seem to have the ring of truth to it. Maybe I'm wrong though. Posted by: Stew on August 20, 2008 3:51 AM What a great work of fiction. I see all the creative writing course paid off. Posted by: brooklynsteve on August 20, 2008 8:24 AM I particularly enjoyed the story where the one client pasted money to her with his semen. Personally I would do worse than these disgusting lowlifes. Posted by: FrankBlack on August 20, 2008 10:40 AM Can I get a number??? :) Posted by: RyanTweed on August 20, 2008 2:29 PM Reminds me of the Sex & the City episode where Carrie accidentally gets paid for banging that businessman... huh. Maybe the author's been watching a little much of that lately? Heard it before, don't buy it. Posted by: SuperAdge on August 20, 2008 3:24 PM Um. This is total fiction. Is Radar so desperate that they needed to run this and so broke that they don't have fact-checkers? This is just pathetic. Posted by: Bette on August 20, 2008 5:06 PM Total, total fiction. Is there a verifiable fact in here? And even the made-up stuff is lame. Let me guess, aging punk rock star, non-stage name, wanted to be made to eat dog food.... Ah, yes! James Osterberg/Iggy Pop and "Now I Wanna Be Your Dog" is a true story!!!!! Geezus.... Posted by: Pedro on August 20, 2008 7:04 PM Damn. I wanted to believe it... I thought it kind of sounded like fun. Of course, I also thought that when I read the Happy Hooker a gazillion years ago. Posted by: girlyalias99 on August 20, 2008 10:25 PM Hey...wasn't this just on "Secret Confessions"? This article is compleeeeeete bullshit. Posted by: JE_in_SJ on August 20, 2008 10:29 PM Not to be a blowhard (ha!) but I'm an ex-hooker. While some of it rings true, I think the author embellished a bit. It's hard for me to imagine a madam being so glib with a journalist. Most of them are shrewd businesswomen with strong survival instincts, and they would not put their necks out like that. Many of my former colleagues tell me they get a lot of letters these days from women seeking advice on how to get into the business. I expect it has a great deal to do with articles like this, The Secret Diary of a Call Girl on Showtime, and it's only going to get worse with "GFE" and "Diary of a Manhattan Callgirl" in production. I'm sure much of it is just the fantasy of glamour and easy money, and most will never follow through, but some will. Money can buy glamor, but the nature of the work is not always very glamorous. Sometimes it's downright exhausting. And it's really fucking dangerous, especially if you're hooking in the United States, where you have to look over your shoulder constantly for both bad tricks AND cops. That really sucks. Posted by: breedaniels on August 20, 2008 10:44 PM I feel like we glamorize prostitution, because it's a really crappy job Posted by: presswhore on August 21, 2008 2:03 AM This article makes me want to move to Cuba and live on rations. Just mention of that whole NYC scene tickles the nihilist in me. I'm glad I got the F out of that shallow and over prized tenement. Posted by: mutale on August 21, 2008 3:20 AM I'm not terribly suprised many of these girls came from privleged or at least reasonably well-off backgrounds. Having known more than my share of Trust Fund Babies, it's common to find that they have a pretty severe personality defect that makes them only understand worth in terms of dollars -- after all, thats the only way their parents ever expressed affection for them, and the way they defined themselves amongst their peers. Of course there are exceptions -- Trust Fund Babies who are actually well-developed human beings, and Hookers who are capable of a normal interior life and human interactions. But they're few and far between -- and of the remainder, few are worse than the examples in this article of people who have developed such severe (and painfully obvious) justifications and coping mechanisms. I haven't met any of these types of girls -- but I've known plenty of guys who escort for wealthy clients, and even though I still count some of them as my friends... I wouldn't trust them further than I could throw them, especially in a relationship. There's some deep hurt (and usually some pretty bad Daddy issues) there usually, under all the "happy hooker" fascade. It either warps them into the most severe of narcissists, or cripples them with the insecurity that no one will ever want them except for their sex, and no one will ever care about them other than the lonely and the desperate. Posted by: daveny on August 21, 2008 12:17 PM wow--this is so obviously fiction...and annoying. Posted by: frenchbelle on August 21, 2008 1:35 PM not fiction!!! why would ANYONE admit to posing as a call girl? its an honest, brilliant article--love all the juicy quotes. I'm sorry that the author had such a nasty bf, but other than that---more power to her! Posted by: maggiepebbles on August 21, 2008 2:08 PM You're a bit silly for paying the madam back. What was she going to do? Call the cops on you? Sue you? "I don't want to encourage young women to become prostitutes," she says. "But they should know that being objectified is not all that bad." I found the article interesting, but in the end, your friends are a waste of human life. Dignity is something that others can't take away from us. It is what we take away from ourselves. Posted by: JustCurious on August 21, 2008 2:19 PM You dont sound like a bohemian. More like a low grade sceneter. flirting with the sex industry is borish. the french were hipper in the 1700s. the ancient romans were more hip. exploitive scribble is very common. the writing style is the epitome of mediocrity. Posted by: ginsu on August 21, 2008 2:41 PM I have to call BULLSHIT on this one. Being as i am a REAL escort there's nothing in the work of fiction that rings true. I could debunk this whole piece line by line but I'll just give a couple of highlights that screams BULLSHIT to me. 1. No escort making 300,000 a year (which is bullshit in itself) is going to happily give over to some "madam" 150,000 to get them clients they are ALREADY getting. Indies don't go agency, agency girls go INDIE. 2. The "madam" gave you her real name and where she worked and invited you to her home? NOT IN A MILLION YEARS. You wouldn't have all that information on her, they are way to smart for that. Double lives is what sex workers lead. That includes madams, agency owners, pimps as well as Escorts. There are ridiculous indescrepancies all over this piece, its just another example of glamorizing the sex for money biz for a juicy story. that's what this is just story. Clients are not powerful, rich, young men who just want a little action on the side and love the finer things in life so they pay thousands of dollars a pop for it. Call girls are not all from rich families and have ivy league educations with high powered day jobs . those are the exceptions not the rules. Anyone who really submerged themselves in the Escort world would have that figured out in a heart beat. This is a HARD job, as one ex-sex worker commented its exhausting. You can make a good living do it but you have to be wired right and it takes a toll and NO ONE i mean NO one does this because they don't have to. every ones reasons are different but no one does this if their isn't a reason deep seated or otherwise for doing it. Jenny DeMilo (a real escort) Posted by: JennyDeMilo on August 21, 2008 3:11 PM Wow, totally and transparently fake. I know the whole hooker thing is a kinky fantasy for a lot of chicks (a LOT of chicks), but writing a fantasy-based (as opposed to reality-based) article and passing it off as the hip new thing? Good god. Well-written and entertaining, but a tragedy for the vapid girls who seriously think they're going to sell their bodies to rich men for hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Just look at the descriptions of the girls in the article: recently graduated, naive entry-level yuppies who are a little trashy and like to party? You know that any guy making decent cash can take these girls home and humiliate them for free, right? It's called the NYC dating scene. Posted by: loc on August 21, 2008 6:38 PM A good piece if it's completely true. Although I would bet that the earning numbers were a bit skewed. I was disappointed about Beatrice being a connector piece. It was a bit unnecessary. Some people like going there and would not like to have to worry about another raid (this time for prostitution). Socialista would have been a better choice. After all, they've already had a Hep C outbreak. Posted by: golfing on August 21, 2008 8:36 PM Female misogyny at its worst. Posted by: nikoluree on August 22, 2008 3:36 AM How many posters here have enough first hand knowledge of this business that they can say for sure this is fake? Why is it impossible that some women can make several hundred thousand dollars a year, when they can charge $1000 an hour (or more)? Also, every business has good and bad people working in it. Is it hard to believe that a madam could be a poor business person, making bad decisions about revealing information to a journalist? Posted by: theirspace on August 22, 2008 8:20 AM Jeny DeMilo- I don't know if you READ the story, but the girls dont work for an agency, so the rates they set are more than you get. Posted by: bettylouxo on August 22, 2008 10:50 AM @BettyLouxo: Yeah I READ it and PIMP, Madam or Agency Its all the same. You work for someone else, they take half or more of your money. I don't work for an agency Betty, I am an Independent GFE escort. I do all the work, i keep all the money. This story is just that... a story. It plays to the fantasy that the main stream wants to believe, all the girls are high dollar hotties commanding thousands of dollars an hour and don't "need" to do this because they come from money, or work a high powered day job or have an Ivy league education. BULLSHIT. :) @Theirspace that's like asking how can someone who works in a hospital know that ER Is fake. Because we live it and when someone writes about your industry and makes stuff up you know how it really is because you work in it day in and day out. A madam who supposedly runs girls who make 3000,000+ a year has got to be a little smarter then giving out her real name occupation and where her day job is. Don't forget what happened to Heidi when she started talking to the press thinking that she was invincible. Oh and NO madam has a day job, their phones ring 24/7. Like i said riddled with inconsistency. here's another fact that could have easily been checked, but obviously wasn't: The author says "Heather, Kelly, and Olivia are all dues-paying members of the International Sex Worker Foundation for Art, Culture, and Education" the international Sex Worker Foundation for Art, Culture, and Education is a non-profit 501(c)3 organization. They don't have "due paying members. They take DONATIONS and by the looks of them they need more, they haven't updated their events page since 2006 and haven't had a new newsletter since spring 2006. i could go on and on and on.... Jenny DeMilo Posted by: JennyDeMilo on August 22, 2008 11:51 AM This article is pure bullshit. Jenny's right. Indies don't go to agencies. And clients don't use their real names. Neither do providers nor their madams. This story's ripped right from the pages of Viva. Posted by: exJohn on August 22, 2008 6:31 PM READ THIS http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2008/08/20/hooking/print.html Posted by: bettylouxo on August 22, 2008 9:34 PM I like the Salon article. But it's also funny for me to read. I was a 23-year-old attractive female when I had my first major piece published. It was a serious political piece for Salon. Jessica Pilot is looking at a short career if she can only write sensationalistic sex articles that include herself getting involved in the action for dying pubs like Radar. Posted by: Bette on August 23, 2008 2:08 AM LOVED the salon piece! Radar PLEASE do a follow up with Ms. Pilot. I respect this girl, and I want to know more about why/how she got involved. Seriously people, WHY ON EARTH would ANYONE IN THEIR RIGHT MINDS fake posing as a hooker. I really enjoyed this piece and will be looking out for her work. Posted by: jonkidd on August 23, 2008 2:59 AM jeez..im soooo tired of reading all these comments...people stop hating on this girl. shes bold, not a bimbo! man, i contacted her last night, was the most humble, witty chick. Radar obviously hyped up her naivate, which is EXPECTED from a mag like this. I feel bad that she has to deal with all this, but haters will be haters Posted by: monicamoneyx on August 23, 2008 5:39 PM jeez..im soooo tired of reading all these comments...people stop hating on this girl. shes bold, not a bimbo! man, i contacted her last night, was the most humble, witty chick. Radar obviously hyped up her naivate, which is EXPECTED from a mag like this. I feel bad that she has to deal with all this, but haters will be haters Posted by: monicamoneyx on August 23, 2008 5:40 PM Jenny DeMilo is right.... This girl didn't know if she was a prostitute or not ? How do you become an educated adult woman journalist who pays her own bills without know whether or not you are a prostitute ? Are we to believe that all women are prostitutes at heart but have just not been offered the opportunity ? How insulting. Any woman with any sense of self knows at a young age that there are things she is unwilling to do for any amount of money. Thanks Jessica Pilot for perpetuating the myth that all women are whores. You must be very proud. Posted by: Tatiana on August 23, 2008 10:06 PM monicamoneyx : You must work for Radar.This girl is NOT bold and she IS a bimbo (who uses that word anymore?)!! Even worse, she's a stupid girl who whored herself out to get published. SHAMEFUL! This is right in the same league as Jessica Cutler. Posted by: Bette on August 24, 2008 1:04 AM All I have to say is enjoy the LAST issue of Radar, again. This pub is done!!! Posted by: Bette on August 24, 2008 1:06 AM wow! so many females angry with Jessica! I don't think she did the piece to get all these people heated. Everyone is entitled to their own belief, and really--there is NO implication that she is in support of prostitution, or encouraging women to do so. Tatiana, why don't you take a step back, and re-read the piece. Kinda rude, woman to woman, if you think about it. IT's interesting that the only journalist so far, that has done an interview (granted, it's only a 5 days) is the editor @ Salon--and it was a damn good one! Of course, I'd love to hear from the girls, but that's just given... Posted by: kittykat90210 on August 24, 2008 3:28 AM I didn't think this was a particularly compelling or well-written piece. Could have been, should have been, but wasn't. The writing was particularly flat in spite of the subject matter. I'm in agreement that most of the juicier bits rang false, and the writer's interjection of herself into the story was completely unnecessary and ultimately took away from it. The working girls featured in the story, Heather, Olivia and Kelly, came off as vapid and social-climbing; that'd be fine, if the writer wasn't clearly intending them to come off as sexy, strong and liberated. There could have been so many more interesting angles to take on this subject, but Jessica Pilot opted to fashion the piece after her own laughable (and seemingly embellished) attempt at gonzo. The critics are right--a simpering, name-dropping, self-congratulatory fable about a Carrie Bradshaw wannabe on a short-lived, self-exploitative joyride. My favorite line: "I don't want to encourage young women to become prostitutes, but they should know that being objectified is not all that bad." Posted by: CarrieNations on August 24, 2008 12:10 PM what rot Posted by: 911truth on August 24, 2008 7:04 PM The writer makes this sound very glamorous, but I suspect the truth is a little different. Am I crazy here, or wouldn't the story have been more interesting if the author had gone through with her encounter with a client. Then maybe she could write about what it really felt like. Posted by: Janeair on August 24, 2008 10:39 PM just becauseit does sound crazy that this goes on--its an important story. that's why she probably wrote it. Posted by: hollygolightly on August 25, 2008 3:32 AM Posted by: hollygolightly on August 26, 2008 12:59 AM First off, loved the piece. This is REALITY. I work in finance, and plenty of guys I've worked with have spent a shitload of money on hookers. I respect her, and hope her subjects are safe. Posted by: steveng on August 27, 2008 12:54 AM I call BS. If this contrived mess was a lead story, Radar's cover would feature a skinny jeaned Fabio locked in a longing embrace with Ashley Dupree. But seriously, Jessica, good luck with the fiction career! Posted by: cbucket on August 27, 2008 4:13 PM CBucket, what are you talking about? Fabio? have you checked out her myspace, man? yes or no? have you ever paid for sex? Posted by: bobbyd on August 27, 2008 11:24 PM Bobbyd -- I'm clueless? Pick up on the pop culture reference. Think about what Fabio did before his posters were tacked to your bedroom walls. Can't figure it out? Maybe you're too young to know, so I'll give you the clue: he was a cover model for trashy romance novels -- fiction's equivalent to this article. Oh yeah, to answer your other question: No, I've never paid for sex. It is, however, perfectly acceptable to question the veracity of the writer's reporting when it comes off so contrived. And no, I sure as hell didn't "check out her myspace, man." Posted by: cbucket on August 28, 2008 11:27 AM Can't wait for the HBO documentary, "Hipsters at the Point." Posted by: mogil on August 28, 2008 12:02 PM I loved this piece, and I think that most of the readers have a preconceived idea of "high class hookers" because of what they have seen, and read before. The author may have been inspired by all the media hype, but this is a very original report. Posted by: Monica301 on August 30, 2008 2:04 PM being a former sex worker, i can tell you- don't believe the hype. Posted by: pennypaxil on August 30, 2008 8:21 PM Great story! Posted by: kasey76 on September 2, 2008 12:24 PM I find myself upset that you allowed the madam lady to get this kind of power over you in the end. You should not have paid her a dime. You owed her nothing and anything she lost was the result of ill-gotten-gains. What you should have done, rather, was reported her to the IRS so that she and her friends could start paying taxes on their collective millions. Posted by: obamafan on September 2, 2008 1:09 PM More power to the girl who has the guts to write such a personal report, and I'm sorry there are those that have to make fun of her choices, instead of taking a step back to acknowledge her integrity Posted by: bobbyd on September 3, 2008 10:47 PM "New York Times reporter poses as hooker on Twitter" now THIS guy, made a BIG mistake...., not Ms. P Posted by: kasey76 on September 4, 2008 9:16 AM Dear Josef: Thanks for speaking with me today, I am sorry that you had such problems The girls on my website that are available are: Amber Easton Just to let you know Kaitlyn went on and on about how good looking you were Let me know if there is an interest. I can send them to you in your country Please let me know what we can do. Tracy From: "Tracy Reed" Dear Yousef, Thanks and I sincerely apologize. We rec over 8 million hits within the Sorry, here are the addiional photos of the girls, they are named. You can go to Stacy Rogers site at www.stacyrogers.com and Sorry and keep trying we are trying to move the website to another server. Tracy > Tracy, From: "Tracy Reed" Dear Yousef, Attached is a letter from Nici, please for my sake keep it confidential, but So, just so you know, can you pass this on to Bella as well as you are good Tracy ----- Original Message ----- > Tracy, Posted by: leslynan on October 15, 2008 10:32 AM
Dear Josef: Thanks for speaking with me today, I am sorry that you had such problems The girls on my website that are available are: Amber Easton Just to let you know Kaitlyn went on and on about how good looking you were Let me know if there is an interest. I can send them to you in your country Please let me know what we can do. Tracy From: "Tracy Reed" Dear Yousef, Thanks and I sincerely apologize. We rec over 8 million hits within the Sorry, here are the addiional photos of the girls, they are named. You can go to Stacy Rogers site at www.stacyrogers.com and Sorry and keep trying we are trying to move the website to another server. Tracy > Tracy, From: "Tracy Reed" Dear Yousef, Attached is a letter from Nici, please for my sake keep it confidential, but So, just so you know, can you pass this on to Bella as well as you are good Tracy ----- Original Message ----- > Tracy, Posted by: leslynan on October 15, 2008 10:37 AM |
![]() All That Glitters As a brand, Barack Obama is a lot like Apple: an upstart superstar that's still vulnerable to attack The Accused How an American coed was framed for murder The Secret Side of Shannen Doherty Now back at West Beverly and teaching drama—what else? —the new 90210's Shannen Doherty opens up to Radar about her phobias (germs, sharks, tabloid reporters), her obsessions (Manolos, Choos, Louboutins), and the secret to her success (a higher power... and it's not Aaron Spelling). The Real McCain In an exclusive interview with Radar, pop maven John McCain sounds off on Jon Stewart, media turncoats, and other stuff The Devil in Bill Maher America's notorious rabble-rouser has launched an all-out attack on religion. Unfortunately, not everyone is in on the joke.
Email us at: tips@radaronline.com or IM: TipRadar ![]() |
|
||
© Copyright 2008, Radar Magazine | ||||






Share This Article
Like this article? Click here to buzz it up on Yahoo!